As
with any type of insurance, the only way for a policyholder to know with some
certainty what is and what is not covered by homeowners insurance is to examine
closely all of the language in the policy. With that important caveat, it is
possible to make some generalizations about coverage under a typical homeowners
policy.
Direct
losses due to lightning, tornadoes, wind storms, and hail are usually covered.
In other words, with the notable exceptions of floods and earthquakes, policies
cover most natural disasters, or "Acts of God" as they are sometimes
called. Commonly covered man‑made losses include vandalism and theft.
Even when there is protection against these perils, however, the insured person
should be certain that any dollar limits on the amount of coverage for specific
items correspond to the value of those items.
For
flood insurance, including protection against mudslides, a property owner will
have to get separate flood insurance provided by the federal government. If
property is flooded because of a broken plumbing or heating system in a house,
there generally is coverage under a standard homeowners policy. Seepage of water
from the ground into a basement, however, is considered a maintenance issue
and is excluded from most policies.
Stolen
personal property is covered, even if it was located far from home at the time
of the theft. Basic coverage only entitles the policyholder to the current value
of the property. For additional money, however, a replacement cost endorsement
for personal property will take care of the full replacement cost, less any
deductible.
Apprehension
about being sued is as big an issue for many homeowners as repairing or replacing
their own property. The typical policy will pay for damages caused by a homeowner's
negligence, as well as the legal costs of defending the homeowner. If the standard
$100,000 limit on liability protection is not enough to make the policyholder
comfortable, a higher limit can be purchased.
Even
the most carefully drafted homeowners policy can leave room for different interpretations,
resulting in litigation. For example, Bonnie hired a worker to do some ordinary
maintenance on her home. When he jumped from a ladder onto the side porch of
her home some support beams gave way on impact. Further inspection revealed
extensive, although previously hidden, carpenter ant damage to the side porch,
a front porch, and a garage.
Bonnie's
insurer denied coverage, except for damage in the area that had collapsed under
the worker. The policy covered losses from hidden insects only if they involved
the "collapse" of all or part of a structure. Bonnie argued that the
term "collapse" was ambiguous enough that it should extend to any
substantial impairment of a building's structural integrity. The court disagreed,
reasoning that "[t]here are no degrees of collapse." The policy covered
only a collapse, not an "imminent" collapse.