Orange County Law Offiice of Patrick Grannan

Orange County Law Offices
Orange County Law Offices


Search Site

Comparison of Wealth Transfer Techniques

One of the main objectives of estate planning is to minimize taxes on the wealth you shift to the next generation. We are going to look at three techniques you can use for this purpose. Each of the techniques below has its own restrictions, advantages and disadvantages depending the specifics of your situation. The table below compares these three wealth transfer techniques in several specific situations. These factors are only a few involved in choosing a particular wealth transfer technique. Please call us if you have any questions about your unique circumstances.

Comparison of Wealth Transfer Techniques:

Situation

Corporate or partnership freeze

Installment sale to a grantor trust

Transfer to a grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT)

The property increases in value after the transfer

Most effective. The use of the four-year grace period for required distributions may allow you to shift the maximum appreciation amount.

Very effective. Assuming no principal payments are required in the first few years, you may shift almost all of the appreciation.

Effective. Some leakage in the shifting of growth is possible if making distributions to the grantor during the early years of the trust term.

The property decreases in value after transfer

Ineffective. If value falls below the value of the retained applicable interest, no value is shifted. Even the value of the initial gift may be lost.

Marginally effective. If you can anticipate the loss of value, the installment note may be prepaid by distribution. If the trust becomes insolvent, you receive no gift back.

Ineffective. If the annuity payments exceed the remainder value of the trust property, you shift no value, and the gift’s leverage is lost.

The risk that the transaction’s structure may be challenged by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) on audit

Fairly safe. You must follow the guidelines of Code Section 2701. Missing any of  the requirements could result in an unintended taxable gift.

Risk must be considered. No Code section, regulation, public ruling or case specifically approves aspects of the transaction.

Greater safety. You must follow code provisions, regulations and proposed regulations. You also need to consider IRS ruling positions on GRATs.

The consequences of IRS adjustment of valuation

Worst result. A gift occurs to the holders of the nonforeign interest. An increase in value may also cause a transaction to be subject to special value rules, and you may owe a gift tax.

Uncertain. If the installment note can be automatically increased, a gift may not result. Revaluation clauses are not favored by IRS, but some authority for them exists.

Good result. The annuity payment should be increased per the trust agreement, resulting in no increase in the gift and no additional gift tax.

Special concerns created by the new rules on the gift tax statute of limitations

Little impact. Generally, a gift tax return is required and if the transaction is adequately disclosed, then the three- or six-year statute of limitations will be applicable.

Significant impact. If structured as a sale for fair market value, there should be no apparent gift. If you don’t file a gift tax return, the statute of limitations will not start. If the IRS determines on a valuation issue that a gift occurred, you could owe interest and penalties.

Little impact. You must file a gifttax return. A proper reporting of the transaction on the gift tax return starts the statute of limitations.

Flexibility of administration of annual payment to the transferor

Limited. The ability to defer your required payment for up to four years gives you limited flexibility in administrating cash flow.

Flexible. The installment note can provide for the deferral of interest or principal payments and may also provide a right to prepay or accelerate interest and principal.

Inflexible. The annuity must be paid each year, and if cash is not available then a distribution should be made. Making a loan to the GRAT to pay the annuity would disqualify the GRAT.

The impact of the transferor’s early death on the transaction

Little effect. Appreciation  from date of transfer to date of death is out of your estate.

Uncertain. Unpaid note balance may be income in respect to a decedent, and transferred property may be included in your estate under a “retained interest” argument.

Least favorable. The transferred property (or possibly a portion of it) is included by statute in your estate.

www.lawoc.com Grannan Law Office, P.C.
  ©1999 Grannan Law Office